An analysis of socrates claim of the immortality of the soul in platos phaedo

The excellence of a race horse is whatever enables it to run well; the excellence of a knife is whatever enables it to cut well; and the excellence of an eye is whatever enables it to see well.

The claim is certainly not that the sensible realm fails to exist or that it exists only partially or incompletely. Ideas such as justice, beauty, truth, goodness, equality, and others are acknowledged to be real, and it is possible for individuals to know what they mean.

Things in the world which appear to be equal in measurement are in fact deficient in the equality they possess 74b, d-e. It was not, however, a cogent piece of reasoning since it ignores the distinction between condition and cause, a point that Socrates apparently recognized at a later stage in the discussion.

The strongest evidence in support of the reminiscence theory, or doctrine of recollection, comes from an examination of the way in which knowledge of universals is obtained. This, of course, would be nonsense, for everyone would know that a man may outwear several coats and the last one that he wears will still be in existence after he has died.

Just how this will be accomplished he is not certain, but the doctrine of reincarnation as set forth in the teachings of the mystery religions offers a solution that he believes is at least something like what will take place.

Metaphysics and Epistemology and Plato II: This leads to biological offspring with ordinary partners, but Diotima considers such offspring as poetry, scientific discoveries, and philosophy to be better. Phaedo explains why a delay occurred between his trial and his death, and describes the scene in a prison at Athens on the final day, naming those present.

Socrates says that poetry is inspired by the musesand is not rational. The thesis to be supported is a generalized version of his earlier advice to Evenus: It is dependent on the material instrument from which it is produced and will perish with the destruction of that instrument.

The pleasures of the body are experienced through the senses, but the acquisition of wisdom comes only through the intellect. Vlastos, Gregory, Plato I: However, regarding those who were not virtuous during life, and so favored the body and pleasures pertaining exclusively to it, Socrates also speaks.

If the two opposite processes did not balance each other out, everything would eventually be in the same state: That is why he puts his trust in thinking rather than in what is experienced through the senses, for in thinking the soul is independent of the body in a way that is not true of the senses.

The philosophic soul according to Socrates has reason, will, and desires united in virtuous harmony. Socrates' description of this event is parallel to that of democracy within the state and the inherent problems that arise. Next Socrates asks if Cebes has any objections.

Plato’s Phaedo: The Soul’s Immortality

As the body desires pleasures of the flesh, so the soul desires wisdom. The Philosopher and Death 59ce Pakaluk, M. The soul, by its very nature, participates in the Form of Life, which means the soul can never die.

He is either represented as a mostly mute bystander in the Sophist and Statesmanor else absent altogether from the cast of characters in the Laws and Critias.

Later, Plato is mentioned along with Crito, Critobolus, and Apollodorus as offering to pay a fine of 30 minas on Socrates' behalf, in lieu of the death penalty proposed by Meletus 38b. He says, "And now I will make answer to you, O my judges, and show that he who has lived as a true philosopher has reason to be of good cheer when he is about to die, and that after death he may hope to receive the greatest good in the other world.

Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, and Phaedo

If the soul existed before birth and in coming to life and being born can be born only from death and dying, it follows that it must continue to exist since it has to be born again.

Socrates' idea that reality is unavailable to those who use their senses is what puts him at odds with the common man, and with common sense. In this view, too, there is no reason to make any distinction between "Socratic philosophy" and "Platonic philosophy.

It is an interest, however, that shows up plainly in the middle period dialogues, especially in the middle books of the Republic.

Anything that becomes greater must become greater after being less, and that which becomes less must have been once greater and then become less. The prisoners are chained in position and so are able to see only shadows cast on the facing wall by statues moved along the wall behind them.

The philosopher, on the other hand, will join the company of the gods. The first is the Argument from Opposites. Knowledge involves the recognition of the Forms Republic V. In recent centuries there have been some changes in the purpose and style of English translations of ancient philosophy.

His use of dramatic elements, including humour, draws the reader in. The properties of sensible composites depend on which of their ingredients are predominant. Echecrates, who was a member of the group, was a Pythagorean, and two other members of the group, Cebes and Simmias, were pupils of the Pythagorean teacher Philolaus.

Aristotle suggests that Socrates' idea of forms can be discovered through investigation of the natural world, unlike Plato's Forms that exist beyond and outside the ordinary range of human understanding.

The Phaedo took place in the morning that Socrates was to die and primarily deals with the immortality of the soul. Phaedo began the story with Echecrates a Pythagorean as he asks Phaedo to tell him what he knows of the death of Socrates.

Plato: Phaedo The Phaedo is one of the most widely read dialogues written by the ancient Greek philosopher Plato. It claims to recount the events and conversations that occurred on the day that Plato’s teacher, Socrates ( B.C.E.), was put to.

Phædo or Phaedo (/ ˈ f iː d oʊ /; Greek: Φαίδων, Phaidōn, Greek pronunciation: [pʰaídɔːn]), also known to ancient readers as On The Soul, is one of the best-known dialogues of Plato's middle period, along with the Republic and the Symposium.

Plato (427—347 B.C.E.)

The philosophical subject of the dialogue is the immortality of the soul. It is set in the last. Plato is one of the world's best known and most widely read and studied philosophers. He was the student of Socrates and the teacher of Aristotle, and he wrote in the middle of the fourth century B.C.E.

in ancient Greece.

Stay Connected

Though influenced primarily by Socrates, to the extent that Socrates is. Forms of Love in Plato's Symposium - Love, in classical Greek literature, is commonly considered as a prominent theme.

Love, in present days, always appears in the categories of books, movies or music, etc. Interpreted differently by different people, Love turns into a multi-faceted being.

Dao Le Prof. Mark Cronin HU - HD April 2, The Immortality of the Soul in Plato’s Phaedo Among Plato’s dialogues, which serve to honor the realm of philosophy in general and Socrates’s life in particular, the Phaedo dramatically and poignantly portrays the death scene of Socrates.

An analysis of socrates claim of the immortality of the soul in platos phaedo
Rated 0/5 based on 15 review
Plato | Life, Philosophy, & Works | omgmachines2018.com